I had better not ever hear a student say there’s nothing worth photographing … The Denver Post’s Plog looks at a year’s worth of images by Mark Hirsch of the same tree.
Yep, 365 photos of one tree, all shot on his phone.
I had better not ever hear a student say there’s nothing worth photographing … The Denver Post’s Plog looks at a year’s worth of images by Mark Hirsch of the same tree.
Yep, 365 photos of one tree, all shot on his phone.
The International Center of Photography has announced their Infinity Awards recognizing outstanding achievements in photography. Eight awards were given and MediaStorm produced films on each of the winners.
David Guttenfelder’s is a great look into how his work out of North Korea has come about. If you mouse over the right side, you can see the play list and watch his. (Of course, the Jeff Bridges one is worth watching, too.)
That quote at the end, about building connections, is why we do this work.
One of these summers, I’m going to make the run up to Charlottesville, Virginia, for the Look3 photo festival I’ve never heard anything but praise for this … and I always have a conflict, it seems.
I need to put it on my 2014 calendar …
(Thanks to Justin Ide for the reminder.)
Over at The New York Times’ Lens blog, Whitney Richardson has a story up about Paul Kwilecki and his photographs of Decatur County, Georgia. Well worth a read and a walk through the gallery.
But it raises a couple of question that, probably, only I can answer … why did Mr. Kwilecki reach out to Duke University to help with his archive? I guess I know that answer – because the University of Georgia doesn’t have a photographic reputation. I want to change that so badly it hurts.
His work is exactly the sort of thing I want housed here, that I want to work with, that I want to help people see and discover.
“I am frequently asked by people who have not seen my work why I spend my life documenting one simple place like Decatur County, Georgia,” he wrote. “People confuse simple with small; they’re not the same thing.”
We may be a small program, but I certainly hope we are not simple.
Technology has changed the way many of us learn information. Used to be, you went to the library or turned to the news. One was old and out of date, the other was in a big building downtown. (Insert rimshot, which one of my students now keeps loaded on her laptop during class … I love these kids.)
We do now live in an age where “information” can come from all sorts of sources. There are the traditional newspapers, magazines, radio and television programs, online publications, social media and even from the sources themselves. And that … well, that worries me. Because you’d think if I wanted to know what the president was doing, his office would be the best place to go for that information.
Except, it’s not. It’s probably about the worst because it isn’t going to put it in context – they’ll tell me what he did and what they hope it means, but that’s different from what it actually means. It’s the difference between news and PR – what’s the source? Is it reliable? Is it biased?
All of this is covered in an AP story by Nancy Blake that looks at the images coming out of the current White House – those from the president’s photographer and those that journalists are not being allowed to make.
The will for presidents to get their story out without media intervention has always been there.
What’s different now, says Mark Jurkowitz of the Pew Research Project for Excellence in Journalism, is new technology that allow the White House to distribute its own content far more widely and effectively than past presidents could. At the same time, it’s getting harder for cash-strapped news outlets to resist using photos, video and other content supplied by the White House.
Be concerned and support your local journalists.
Nice gallery up over at CNN.com looking at the work of Paul McDonough did while road tripping across America in the 1970s. Some fun stuff in there, makes me rethink how to shoot my vacation photos.
I hesitated before posting this because a casual read may encourage others to try what she did, to cause others to believe this wasn’t as difficult or harrowing as it probably was. With a decade’s worth of memories between the experience and the writing, there are sure to be details that have been left out.
Yesterday, we had our second annual Business of Visual Journalism symposium here and one of our speakers, Laurie Shock from Shock Design, left a copy of her presentation to share. Since I had a lot of requests, I’ve posted it online.
I did pull out a lot of the images she used because of some copyright concerns as well as to get the file size down. Towards the end, there is a ton of links and good information about the process of book design. Well worth going through, even if you didn’t make it to the talk.
Today’s the day … here’s the line up, all in the Drewry Room of Grady College. If you’re nearby, stop on in.
We should have live tweets on the hashtag #ugavj, as well.