Judge Tosses Anti-Paparazzi Charges Against Photographer

I really hope this is the only time I ever have to mention Justin Bieber on my site … a California judge has dismissed charges against photographer Paul Raef after he was charged under an anti-paparazzi law that raised the penalty for reckless driving when involved in the pursuit of a photo for commercial gain.

California has a history of passing these laws and then having them overturned, hopefully this one is headed in the same direction. Note that I will never support members of the media breaking the law, but to pass laws specifically designed to target journalistic acts protected by the First Amendment is not okay. (And, yeah, I would question weather a photo of a pop star should really be protected at the same level as an investigation of a public official, but it is and I do not want the country getting into massive debates over splitting hairs.)

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.
Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <ol> <ul> <li> <strong>

Ready?
Required
Required