Is Branding Bad?

Gene Weingarten at the Washington Post takes on the idea of building your brand as a journalist.

It’s an interesting, idealistic, ingenious read … that I mostly disagree with, which makes me a little sick. I want so badly to go back to where I started, which is maybe a little different from where Weingarten started:

When I was a hungry young reporter in the 1970s, I thought of myself as a superman, an invincible crusader for truth and justice — even though, looking back at old pictures, I now see that I resembled an emaciated weasel in unattractive clothing. My goals, however, were unambiguous, and heroic: 1) Get great stories that improve the world. 2) Get famous. 3) Get doe-eyed young women to lean in close and whisper, “Take me.”

Note the order. First came the work.

But those times have gone away and, while I hope and pray they come back, right now, it is about branding. While the story used to matter so much more than the journalist who brought it to you, readers* now want to connect with the story, usually through the storyteller. They want to feel like they are on the inside, getting something from a friend that they and only they have.

We keep saying that news is a commodity. I’m not so sure it is – I think news is maybe better looked at as a secret, and everyone wants in on the secret.

(*Please, please, please call me out whenever I refer to readers as “users” – there’s a reason drug addicts are called users, let’s distance ourselves from that ideal.)

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.
Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <ol> <ul> <li> <strong>

Ready?
Required
Required